On Disavowing Ritualism

For some time, at least the last 2 years or so, I have been a fairly avowed Ritualist.  For those who don’t know, a ritualist is, according to the dictionary, “a student of or authority on ritual practices or religious rites; a person who practices or advocates observance of ritual, as in religious services.”  For me, the ritual was what brought about Faith and especially a Catholic holistic Faith.  Ritualism was the child of the Oxford Movement.  Ritualism held at it’s heart that ‘beauty will save the world’ and brought forth some fo the greatest catholic missionary movements within the Anglican Church.  However, it had a theological foundation that was found in the Fathers of the Oxford Movement.  The Oxford Fathers developed the Tracts not to win chasubles and monstrances, but to set a foundation of ecclesiology and theology that presented a Church and Faith that was saved from the excesses of the Continental Reformation and the Medieval Roman innovations.  What the Oxford Fathers like John Keble, Edward Pusey, and John Henry Newman fought for was the heart and soul of the Church and the Established Church’s place within the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

What I am coming to the realization now is that we are back to square one here in North America. With the most recent communique from the ACNA’s Taskforce on Holy Orders and the Rites for Baptism and Confirmation that were just released, it has become more apparent that we have lost our bearings as a Anglican Church.  We desperately need a (new) Oxford Movement, and not yet a Ritualist movement.  We have to tell our stories, repeat our history, and provide a voice for the Faith Once Delivered.  What this (new) Oxford Movement will (hopefully) accomplish is laying a more solid foundation for our work in the ‘highways and by-ways’ to be done.  As catholics in the Anglican way, we have to take back ‘social justice’ from the broad church liberals and take back the words ‘evangelical’ and ‘missional’ from the fundamentalist conservatives.  We are, as a great teacher once said, ‘Biblical Catholics’ and let’s run with that label.

So I disavow my ritualist label and lay it down for the sake of the Church.  I still love ritual and liturgics, but I truly believe we have to educate and invite those around us and in our parishes into a revival of catholic thought and theology.  We have to start from the ground floor of catechesis and do the hard work of ‘a long obedience in the same direction.’ I hope to lay some more thoughts soon as I think through the implications of going back to our centre as a Church and especially for those of us who self-identify as Catholics within the Anglican Way.


4 thoughts on “On Disavowing Ritualism

  1. Joshua,

    Would you care to comment a bit more — either online or privately — about your statement:

    “With the most recent communique from the ACNA’s Taskforce on Holy Orders and the Rites for Baptism and Confirmation that were just released, it has become more apparent that we have lost our bearings as a Anglican Church.”

    I would like to know your specific concerns with the proposed baptismal/confirmation liturgy. This is not a challenge (!), just a genuine expression of interest.

    Blessings, Deacon Joshua.

    1. Fr John- I am planning on working through this– mainly the language of regeneration being lost in the Baptismal rite and the downplay of sacramental character in the conformation rite. As for the Comminique, I would say that it shows that there is no clear understanding of Holy Orders within the ACNA, and again, this causes confusion.

  2. Thanks. I would like to read your fully developed thoughts on this. Just one additional question for now: would you say that the new rite is lacking in essential substance or more in precise language? For example, while the language of regeneration is lost, the substance — born again — seems to be retained. Wherein lies the essential problem?

    1. I think precise language, at least from my opinion. However, I think there is a lack of educated clergy who will use this lack of precise language to push a less Anglican agenda. But that’s my own opinion:)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s